Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- bacteria:t3e:xopaf [2020/07/04 06:27]
guidos [XopAF]
+++ bacteria:t3e:xopaf [2020/07/09 12:45]
rkoebnik [Conservation]
@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 Prototype: AvrXv3 (//Xanthomonas euvesicatoria //pv.// perforans//)\\
 RefSeq ID: [[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/protein/|WP_145590005.1]] (218 aa)\\
+Synonym: AvrXv3\\
 D structure: Unknown
@@ Line 35: / Line 36: @@
 Tomato RxvT3 resistance protein (has not been identified yet).
+=====   =====
 ===== Conservation =====
@@ Line 40: / Line 43: @@
 === In xanthomonads ===
-Yes (Washington //et al//., 2016).
+Yes (//e.g.//, //X. alfalfae//, //X. citri//, //X. translucens//) (Washington //et al//., 2016).
 === In other plant pathogens/symbionts ===
-Yes (Washington //et al//., 2016).
+Yes (//Pseudomonas, Acidovorax//, //Ralstonia// spp.) (Washington //et al//., 2016).
 ===== References =====
 Astua-Monge G, Minsavage VG, Stall ER, Davis JM, Bonas U, Jones BJ (2000). Resistance of tomato and pepper to T3 strains of //Xanthomonas campestris// pv. vesicatoria is specified by a plant-inducible avirulence gene. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 13: 911-921. DOI: [[http://doi.org10.1007/s10142-007-0050-y|10.1094/MPMI.2000.13.9.911]]
-Balaji V, Gibly A, Debbie P, Sessa G (2007). Transcriptional analysis of the tomato resistance response triggered by recognition of the //Xanthomonas// type III effector AvrXv3. Funct. Integr. Genomics 7: 305-3016. DOI: [[https://doi.org/10.1007/s10142-007-0050-y]]
+Balaji V, Gibly A, Debbie P, Sessa G (2007). Transcriptional analysis of the tomato resistance response triggered by recognition of the //Xanthomonas// type III effector AvrXv3. Funct. Integr. Genomics 7: 305-3016. DOI: [[https://doi.org/10.1007/s10142-007-0050-y|https://doi.org/10.1007/s10142-007-0050-y]]
 Minsavage GV, Jones JB, Stall RE (1996). Cloning and sequencing of an avirulence gene (//avrRxv3//) isolated from //Xanthomonas campestris// pv. vesicatoria tomato race 3. Phytopathology 86: S15.
@@ Line 55: / Line 59: @@
 Washington EJ, Mukhtar MS, Finkel MO, Wan L, Banfield JM, Kieber JJ, Dangl LJ (2016). //Pseudomonas syringae// type III effector HopAF1 suppresses plant immunity by targeting methionine recycling to block ethylene induction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 113: E3577-E3586. DOI: [[https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1606322113|10.1073/pnas.1606322113]]
+===== Further reading =====
+Gibly A, Bonshtien A, Balaji V, Debbie P, Martin GB, Sessa G (2004). Identification and expression profiling of tomato genes differentially regulated during a resistance response to //Xanthomonas campestris// pv. //vesicatoria//. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 17: 1212-1222. DOI: [[https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI.2004.17.11.1212|10.1094/MPMI.2004.17.11.1212]]
+Jalan N, Kumar D, Andrade MO, Yu F, Jones JB, Graham JH, White FF, Setubal JC, Wang N (2013). Comparative genomic and transcriptome analyses of pathotypes of //Xanthomonas citri //subsp. //citri// provide insights into mechanisms of bacterial virulence and host range. BMC Genomics 14: 551. DOI: [[https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-14-551|10.1186/1471-2164-14-551]]
+Timilsina S, Abrahamian P, Potnis N, Minsavage GV, White FF, Staskawicz BJ, Jones JB, Vallad GE, Goss EM (2016). Analysis of sequenced genomes of Xanthomonas perforans identifies candidate targets for resistance breeding in tomato. Phytopathology 106: 1097-1104. DOI: [[https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-03-16-0119-FI|10.1094/PHYTO-03-16-0119-FI]]

EuroXanth DokuWiki

User Tools

Site Tools

Differences

Page Tools