Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- bacteria:t3e:xopaq [2020/07/01 10:32]
rkoebnik [Biological function]
+++ bacteria:t3e:xopaq [2020/07/01 10:53]
rkoebnik [XopAQ]
@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 Author: Jose Gadea\\
-Internal reviewer: Saul Burdman
+Internal reviewer: Saul Burdman\\
 Expert reviewer: FIXME
@@ Line 41: / Line 40: @@
 === In xanthomonads ===
-Yes. The effector is widely present in the most agressive citrus canker-causing //X.citri// A strains but also in the AW strain (narrow host range) (Escalon //et al//., 2013; Garita-Cambronero //et al//., 2019), and also in the milder //X. fuscans// B strain, but not in the //X. fuscans// C strain, whic is restricted to //C. aurantifoli// (Dalio //et al//., 2017). Present in //Xanthomonas gardneri// but not in some strains of //X. perforans// nor //X. euvesicatoria// strains affecting pepper and tomato (Potnis //et al//., 2011; Schwartz //et al//., 2015; Vancheva //et al//., 2015; Jibrin //et al//., 2018). Two paralogs of XopAQ are present in strains 66b and LMG 918 of //X. euvesicatoria//, but not present in other LMG strains, 83b, 85-10, or //X. euvesicatoria// pv. //rosa// (Barak //et al//., 2016). Present in pathogenic but not in non-pathogenic// X. arboricola// pv. //pruni// (Garita-Cambronero //et al//., 2016a, 2019). Absent in the related //X. juglandis// or //X. corylina// (Garita-Cambronero //et al//., 2018). Also present in //X. citri// pv. //viticola// (Schwartz //et al//., 2015) and other //X. citri// pathovars (blastp analysis). //X. phaseolis// //and X. populi//, among others, posess putative genes encoding proteins with moderate homology to XopAQ based on Blastp analysis.
+Yes. The effector is widely present in the most agressive citrus canker-causing //X.citri// A strains but also in the AW strain (narrow host range) (Escalon //et al//., 2013; Garita-Cambronero //et al//., 2019), and also in the milder //X. fuscans// B strain, but not in the //X. fuscans// C strain, whic is restricted to //C. aurantifoli// (Dalio //et al//., 2017). Present in //Xanthomonas gardneri// but not in some strains of //X. perforans// nor //X. euvesicatoria// strains affecting pepper and tomato (Potnis //et al//., 2011; Schwartz //et al//., 2015; Vancheva //et al//., 2015; Jibrin //et al//., 2018). Two paralogs of XopAQ are present in strains 66b and LMG 918 of //X. euvesicatoria//, but not present in other LMG strains, 83b, 85-10, or //X. euvesicatoria// pv. //rosa// (Barak //et al//., 2016). Present in pathogenic but not in non-pathogenic// X. arboricola// pv. //pruni// (Garita-Cambronero //et al//., 2016, 2019). Absent in the related //X. juglandis// or //X. corylina// (Garita-Cambronero //et al//., 2018). Also present in //X. citri// pv. //viticola// (Schwartz //et al//., 2015) and other //X. citri// pathovars (blastp analysis). //X. phaseolis// //and X. populi//, among others, posess putative genes encoding proteins with moderate homology to XopAQ based on Blastp analysis.
 === In other plant pathogens/symbionts ===

EuroXanth DokuWiki

User Tools

Site Tools

Differences

Page Tools