User Tools

Site Tools


bacteria:t3e:xopaq

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
bacteria:t3e:xopaq [2020/07/01 10:32]
rkoebnik [Biological function]
bacteria:t3e:xopaq [2020/07/03 09:57] (current)
rkoebnik
Line 1: Line 1:
 ====== XopAQ ====== ====== XopAQ ======
  
-Author: Jose Gadea\\ +Author: [[https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jose_Gadea|Jose Gadea]]\\ 
-Internal reviewer: Saul Burdman +Internal reviewer: [[https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Saul_Burdman|Saul Burdman]]\\
 Expert reviewer: FIXME Expert reviewer: FIXME
  
Line 41: Line 40:
 === In xanthomonads === === In xanthomonads ===
  
-Yes. The effector is widely present in the most agressive citrus canker-causing //X.citri// A strains but also in the AW strain (narrow host range) (Escalon //et al//., 2013; Garita-Cambronero //et al//., 2019), and also in the milder //X. fuscans// B strain, but not in the //X. fuscans// C strain, whic is restricted to //C. aurantifoli// (Dalio //et al//., 2017). Present in //Xanthomonas gardneri// but not in some strains of //X. perforans// nor //X. euvesicatoria// strains affecting pepper and tomato (Potnis //et al//., 2011; Schwartz //et al//., 2015; Vancheva //et al//., 2015; Jibrin //et al//., 2018). Two paralogs of XopAQ are present in strains 66b and LMG 918 of //X. euvesicatoria//, but not present in other LMG strains, 83b, 85-10, or //X. euvesicatoria// pv. //rosa// (Barak //et al//., 2016). Present in pathogenic but not in non-pathogenic// X. arboricola// pv. //pruni// (Garita-Cambronero //et al//., 2016a, 2019). Absent in the related //X. juglandis// or //X. corylina// (Garita-Cambronero //et al//., 2018). Also present in //X. citri// pv. //viticola// (Schwartz //et al//., 2015) and other //X. citri// pathovars (blastp analysis). //X. phaseolis// //and X. populi//, among others, posess putative genes encoding proteins with moderate homology to XopAQ based on Blastp analysis.+Yes. The effector is widely present in the most agressive citrus canker-causing //X.citri// A strains but also in the AW strain (narrow host range) (Escalon //et al//., 2013; Garita-Cambronero //et al//., 2019), and also in the milder //X. fuscans// B strain, but not in the //X. fuscans// C strain, whic is restricted to //C. aurantifoli// (Dalio //et al//., 2017). Present in //Xanthomonas gardneri// but not in some strains of //X. perforans// nor //X. euvesicatoria// strains affecting pepper and tomato (Potnis //et al//., 2011; Schwartz //et al//., 2015; Vancheva //et al//., 2015; Jibrin //et al//., 2018). Two paralogs of XopAQ are present in strains 66b and LMG 918 of //X. euvesicatoria//, but not present in other LMG strains, 83b, 85-10, or //X. euvesicatoria// pv. //rosa// (Barak //et al//., 2016). Present in pathogenic but not in non-pathogenic// X. arboricola// pv. //pruni// (Garita-Cambronero //et al//., 2016, 2019). Absent in the related //X. juglandis// or //X. corylina// (Garita-Cambronero //et al//., 2018). Also present in //X. citri// pv. //viticola// (Schwartz //et al//., 2015) and other //X. citri// pathovars (blastp analysis). //X. phaseolis// //and X. populi//, among others, posess putative genes encoding proteins with moderate homology to XopAQ based on Blastp analysis.
 === In other plant pathogens/symbionts === === In other plant pathogens/symbionts ===
  
 Yes (//Ralstonia//). Yes (//Ralstonia//).
- 
 ===== References ===== ===== References =====
  
Line 56: Line 54:
 Ferreira MASV, Bonneau S, Briand M, Cesbron S, Portier P, Darrasse A, Gama MAS, Barbosa MAG, Mariano RLR, Souza EB, Jacques MA (2009). //Xanthomonas citri// pv. //viticola// affecting grapevine in Brazil: Emergence of a successful monomorphic pathogen. Front. Plant Sci. 10: 489. DOI: [[https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00489|10.3389/fpls.2019.00489]] Ferreira MASV, Bonneau S, Briand M, Cesbron S, Portier P, Darrasse A, Gama MAS, Barbosa MAG, Mariano RLR, Souza EB, Jacques MA (2009). //Xanthomonas citri// pv. //viticola// affecting grapevine in Brazil: Emergence of a successful monomorphic pathogen. Front. Plant Sci. 10: 489. DOI: [[https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00489|10.3389/fpls.2019.00489]]
  
-Garita-Cambronero J (2016). Genómica comparativa de cepas de //Xanthomonas arborícola// asociadas a //Prunus ssp//. Caracterización de los procesos de infección de la mancha bacteriana de frutales de hueso y almendro. Doctoral Thesis, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Spain.+Garita-Cambronero J (2016). Genómica comparativa de cepas de //Xanthomonas arborícola// asociadas a //Prunus ssp//. Caracterización de los procesos de infección de la mancha bacteriana de frutales de hueso y almendro. Doctoral Thesis, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Spain. PDF: [[http://oa.upm.es/45480/|oa.upm.es/45480/]]
  
 Garita-Cambronero J, Palacio-Bielsa A, Cubero J (2018). //Xanthomonas arboricola// pv. //pruni//, causal agent of bacterial spot of stone fruits and almond: its genomic and phenotypic characteristics in the //X. arboricola// species context. Mol. Plant Pathol. 19: 2053-2065. DOI: [[https://doi.org/10.1111/mpp.12679|10.1111/mpp.12679]] Garita-Cambronero J, Palacio-Bielsa A, Cubero J (2018). //Xanthomonas arboricola// pv. //pruni//, causal agent of bacterial spot of stone fruits and almond: its genomic and phenotypic characteristics in the //X. arboricola// species context. Mol. Plant Pathol. 19: 2053-2065. DOI: [[https://doi.org/10.1111/mpp.12679|10.1111/mpp.12679]]
bacteria/t3e/xopaq.1593592345.txt.gz · Last modified: 2020/07/01 10:32 by rkoebnik