This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
bacteria:t3e:xopag [2020/07/03 11:00] rkoebnik |
bacteria:t3e:xopag [2021/01/25 21:59] rkoebnik |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Author: [[https:// | Author: [[https:// | ||
- | Internal reviewer: | + | Internal reviewer: |
- | Expert reviewer: | + | Expert reviewer: |
Class: XopAG\\ | Class: XopAG\\ | ||
Family: XopAG\\ | Family: XopAG\\ | ||
- | Prototype: XopAG (// | + | Prototype: XopAG (// |
- | RefSeq ID: [[https:// | + | RefSeq ID: [[https:// |
- | 3D structure: | + | Synonym: AvrGf1\\ |
+ | 3D structure: | ||
===== Biological function ===== | ===== Biological function ===== | ||
Line 18: | Line 19: | ||
=== (Experimental) evidence for being a T3E === | === (Experimental) evidence for being a T3E === | ||
+ | An active TTSS is necessary for HR produced by avrGf1 in grapefruit leaves, as it was proven by transconjugation experiments (Rybak //et al//., 2009). | ||
=== Regulation === | === Regulation === | ||
+ | No data available. The effector gene //xopAG// was however shown to be induced in XVM2 medium compared to NB medium in X. citri subsp. citri A< | ||
=== Phenotypes === | === Phenotypes === | ||
- | All // | + | All // |
=== Localization === | === Localization === | ||
Line 28: | Line 31: | ||
=== Enzymatic function === | === Enzymatic function === | ||
+ | AvrGf2 elicited rapid cell death in grapfruit leaves (Gonchez //et al//., 2015), detailed enzymatic function has not been determined yet. | ||
=== Interaction partners === | === Interaction partners === | ||
- | The XopAG AvrGf2 effector contains a Cyp-binding site that is essential for the elicitation of HR in citrus (Gochez //et al//., 2017). | + | The XopAG AvrGf2 effector contains a Cyp-binding site that is essential for the elicitation of HR in citrus (Gochez //et al//., 2017). Yeast two-hybrid experiments showed strong interaction of AvrGf2 with grapefruit cyclophilin (GfCyp), whereas mutation of the GPLL motif in the cyclophilin-binding domain abolished the interaction. |
===== Conservation ===== | ===== Conservation ===== | ||
=== In xanthomonads === | === In xanthomonads === | ||
- | Yes (e.g. //X.c.// pv. // | + | Yes (//e.g.//, //X. campestris//, //X. vasicola//) (Gochez //et al//., 2017). |
=== In other plant pathogens/ | === In other plant pathogens/ | ||
- | Yes (e.g. //P.s.// pv. // | + | Yes (//e.g.//, //P. syringae.// pv. // |
===== References ===== | ===== References ===== | ||
Line 44: | Line 48: | ||
Figueiredo JF, Romer P, Lahaye T, Graham JH, White FF, Jones JB (2011). // | Figueiredo JF, Romer P, Lahaye T, Graham JH, White FF, Jones JB (2011). // | ||
+ | |||
+ | <font 10.5pt/ | ||
Gochez AM, Shantharaj D, Potnis N, Zhou X, Minsavage GV, White FF, Wang N, Hurlbert JC, Jones JB (2017). Molecular characterization of XopAG effector AvrGf2 from // | Gochez AM, Shantharaj D, Potnis N, Zhou X, Minsavage GV, White FF, Wang N, Hurlbert JC, Jones JB (2017). Molecular characterization of XopAG effector AvrGf2 from // | ||
+ | |||
+ | Jalan N, Kumar D, Andrade MO, Yu F, Jones JB, Graham JH, White FF, Setubal JC, Wang N (2013). Comparative genomic and transcriptome analyses of pathotypes of // | ||
Rybak M, Minsavage GV, Stall RE, Jones JB (2009). Identification of // | Rybak M, Minsavage GV, Stall RE, Jones JB (2009). Identification of // | ||