This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
bacteria:t3e:xopi [2020/06/30 23:18] irodrigues |
bacteria:t3e:xopi [2020/07/08 18:46] rkoebnik [XopI] |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
====== XopI ====== | ====== XopI ====== | ||
- | Author: Trainees from the EuroXanth | + | Author: |
Internal reviewer: Isabel Rodrigues\\ | Internal reviewer: Isabel Rodrigues\\ | ||
Expert reviewer: FIXME | Expert reviewer: FIXME | ||
Class: XopI\\ | Class: XopI\\ | ||
- | Family: | + | Family: |
- | Prototype: (// | + | Prototype: (// |
RefSeq ID: [[https:// | RefSeq ID: [[https:// | ||
3D structure: Unknown | 3D structure: Unknown | ||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
=== Interaction partners === | === Interaction partners === | ||
- | XopR and XopS belong to //Xcv// translocation class A, comprising T3Es whose translocation into plant cells is completely dependent on HpaB, whereas XopB, XopG, **XopI**, XopK, XopM and XopV were assigned to class B, because they are still translocated in the absence of HpaB (Büttner //et al.//, 2006). Both new class A effectors lack homology to known proteins or motifs, so that their molecular function remains elusive. By contrast, the class B effectors comprise the putative enzyme XopG, a member of the HopH family | + | XopR and XopS belong to //Xcv// translocation class A, comprising T3Es whose translocation into plant cells is completely dependent on HpaB, whereas XopB, XopG, **XopI**, XopK, XopM and XopV were assigned to class B, because they are still translocated in the absence of HpaB (Büttner //et al.//, 2006). Both new class A effectors lack homology to known proteins or motifs, so that their molecular function remains elusive. By contrast, the class B effectors comprise the putative enzyme XopG, a member of the HopH family of putative zinc metalloproteases. Other effectors possess interesting features, for example XopI contains an F‐box motif typical for eukaryotic proteins playing a role in the ubiquitin‐26S proteasome system (UPS). The UPS controls protein stability in eukaryotes and appears to be a favorable target for many T3Es, for example members of the GALA family, which strongly contribute to the virulence of //R. solanacearum// |
===== Conservation ===== | ===== Conservation ===== | ||
Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
===== References ===== | ===== References ===== | ||
- | <font 10.5pt/ | + | <font 10.5pt/ |
- | Nagel O, Bonas U (2018). The // | + | Nagel O, Bonas U (2018). The // |
Salomon D, Dar D, Sreeramulu S, Sessa G (2011). Expression of // | Salomon D, Dar D, Sreeramulu S, Sessa G (2011). Expression of // | ||
Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
Üstün S, Börnke F (2014). Interactions of // | Üstün S, Börnke F (2014). Interactions of // | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Further reading ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Thieme F (2006). Genombasierte Identifizierung neuer potentieller Virulenzfaktoren von // | ||