EuroXanth DokuWiki

User Tools

Site Tools

Trace:
bacteria:t3e:xopj2

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision 		Previous revision
bacteria:t3e:xopj2 [2020/07/09 17:31]
rkoebnik [Further reading] 		bacteria:t3e:xopj2 [2020/08/11 14:43] (current)
rkoebnik
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 Author: [[https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Daiva_Burokiene|Daiva Burokienė]]\\ Author: [[https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Daiva_Burokiene|Daiva Burokienė]]\\
-Internal reviewer: FIXME \\+Internal reviewer: [[https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Eran_Bosis|Eran Bosis]]\\
 Expert reviewer: FIXME Expert reviewer: FIXME
  
Line 32: Line 32:
   * Resistance in Pi-0 was found to be caused by a recessive mutation predicted to inactivate a carboxylesterase known to hydrolyze lysophospholipids and acylated proteins in eukaryotes. Transgenic Pi-0 plants expressing the wild-type allele from the //A. thaliana//  ecotype Columbia were susceptible to //Pst//  DC3000 AvrRpt2-AvrBsT-HA infection. These data indicated that the carboxylesterase inhibits AvrBsT-triggered phenotypes in //Arabidopsis//, and the resistance gene was therefore called //SOBER1//  (Suppressor Of AvrBsT-Elicited Resistance 1), where the inactive allele in Pi-0, //sober1-1//, provides resistance (Cunnac //et al//., 2007).   * Resistance in Pi-0 was found to be caused by a recessive mutation predicted to inactivate a carboxylesterase known to hydrolyze lysophospholipids and acylated proteins in eukaryotes. Transgenic Pi-0 plants expressing the wild-type allele from the //A. thaliana//  ecotype Columbia were susceptible to //Pst//  DC3000 AvrRpt2-AvrBsT-HA infection. These data indicated that the carboxylesterase inhibits AvrBsT-triggered phenotypes in //Arabidopsis//, and the resistance gene was therefore called //SOBER1//  (Suppressor Of AvrBsT-Elicited Resistance 1), where the inactive allele in Pi-0, //sober1-1//, provides resistance (Cunnac //et al//., 2007).
   * It was later shown that Pi-0 leaves infected with //Pst//  DC3000 expressing AvrBsT accumulated higher levels of phosphatidic acid (PA) compared to leaves infected with //Pst//  DC3000. Phospholipase D (PLD) activity was required for high PA levels and AvrBsT-dependent HR in Pi-0. Overexpression of SOBER1 in Pi-0 reduced PA levels and inhibited HR. These data implicated PA, phosphatidylcholine (PC) and lysophosphatidylcholine (LysoPC) as potential SOBER1 substrates. Recombinant His<sub>6</sub>-SOBER1 hydrolyzed PC but not PA or LysoPC in vitro indicating that the enzyme has phospholipase A2 (PLA2) activity. Chemical inhibition of PLA2 activity in leaves expressing SOBER1 resulted in HR in response to Pst DC3000 AvrBsT. These data were consistent with the model that SOBER1 PLA2 activity suppresses PLD-dependent production of PA in response to AvrBsT elicitation (Kirik //et al//., 2009).   * It was later shown that Pi-0 leaves infected with //Pst//  DC3000 expressing AvrBsT accumulated higher levels of phosphatidic acid (PA) compared to leaves infected with //Pst//  DC3000. Phospholipase D (PLD) activity was required for high PA levels and AvrBsT-dependent HR in Pi-0. Overexpression of SOBER1 in Pi-0 reduced PA levels and inhibited HR. These data implicated PA, phosphatidylcholine (PC) and lysophosphatidylcholine (LysoPC) as potential SOBER1 substrates. Recombinant His<sub>6</sub>-SOBER1 hydrolyzed PC but not PA or LysoPC in vitro indicating that the enzyme has phospholipase A2 (PLA2) activity. Chemical inhibition of PLA2 activity in leaves expressing SOBER1 resulted in HR in response to Pst DC3000 AvrBsT. These data were consistent with the model that SOBER1 PLA2 activity suppresses PLD-dependent production of PA in response to AvrBsT elicitation (Kirik //et al//., 2009).
-  * Transgenic //Arabidopsis//  plants overexpression AvrBsT upon dexamethasone (DEX) induction showed reduced susceptibility to infection with the obligate biotrophic oomycete //Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis//  (Hwang //et al//., 2012). In contrast, overexpression dexamethasone //(DEX)//://avrBsT//  plants exhibited enhanced susceptibility to //Pseudomonas syringae//  pv. //tomato//  (Pst) DC3000 infection (Hwang //et al//., 2012). Thus, AvrBsT overexpression leads to both disease and defense responses to microbial pathogens of different lifestyles (Hwang //et al//., 2012).+  * Transgenic //Arabidopsis//  plants overexpression AvrBsT upon dexamethasone (DEX) induction showed reduced susceptibility to infection with the obligate biotrophic oomycete //Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis//  (Hwang //et al//., 2012). In contrast, plants overexpressing dexamethasone //(DEX)//://avrBsT//  exhibited enhanced susceptibility to //Pseudomonas syringae//  pv. //tomato//  (Pst) DC3000 infection (Hwang //et al//., 2012). Thus, AvrBsT overexpression leads to both disease and defense responses to microbial pathogens of different lifestyles (Hwang //et al//., 2012).
   * Phylogenomics revealed that a host-range expansion of //X. euvesicatoria//  pv. //perforans//  (//Xep//) field strains on pepper is due, in part, to a loss of the effector AvrBsT. Further studies with //Xep//  demonstrated that a double deletion of //avrBsT//  and //xopQ//  allowed a host range expansion for //Nicotiana benthamiana//  (Schwartz //et al//., 2015).   * Phylogenomics revealed that a host-range expansion of //X. euvesicatoria//  pv. //perforans//  (//Xep//) field strains on pepper is due, in part, to a loss of the effector AvrBsT. Further studies with //Xep//  demonstrated that a double deletion of //avrBsT//  and //xopQ//  allowed a host range expansion for //Nicotiana benthamiana//  (Schwartz //et al//., 2015).
   * Later, AvrBsT was found to contribute to fitness of //Xep//  on tomato plants under field conditions (Abrahamian //et al//., 2018).   * Later, AvrBsT was found to contribute to fitness of //Xep//  on tomato plants under field conditions (Abrahamian //et al//., 2018).
Line 42: Line 42:
 === Enzymatic function === === Enzymatic function ===
  
-AvrBsT belongs to the YopJ family, members of which were shown to act as cysteine proteases, which contain a catalytic triad (His, Glu, Cys). It was shown that AvrBsT requires a functional protease catalytic core to trigger defense responses in resistant plant cells, suggesting that AvrBsT acts as a protease to disrupt immune signaling pathways (Orth //et al//., 2000). AvrBsT was later shown to possess acetyltransferase activity and acetylates ACIP1 (for //ACETYLATED INTERACTING PROTEIN1//) from //Arabidopsis//. Genetic studies revealed that //Arabidopsis//  ACIP family members are required for both pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP)-triggered immunity and AvrBsT-triggered ETI during //Pst//  DC3000 infection. Microscopy studies revealed that ACIP1 is associated with punctae on the cell cortex and some of these punctae co-localize with microtubules. Wild-type //Pst//  DC3000 or //Pst//  DC3000 AvrRpt2 infection triggered the formation of numerous, small ACIP1 punctae and rods. By contrast, //Pst//  DC3000 AvrBsT infection primarily triggered the formation of large GFP-ACIP1 aggregates, in an acetyltransferase-dependent manner. These data suggested that AvrBsT-dependent acetylation //in planta//  alters ACIP1’s defense function, which is linked to the activation of ETI (Cheong //et al//., 2014).+AvrBsT belongs to the YopJ family, members of which were shown to act as cysteine proteases containing a catalytic triad (His, Glu, Cys). It was shown that AvrBsT requires a functional protease catalytic core to trigger defense responses in resistant plant cells, suggesting that AvrBsT acts as a protease to disrupt immune signaling pathways (Orth //et al//., 2000). AvrBsT was later shown to possess acetyltransferase activity and acetylates ACIP1 (for //ACETYLATED INTERACTING PROTEIN1//) from //Arabidopsis//. Genetic studies revealed that //Arabidopsis//  ACIP family members are required for both pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP)-triggered immunity and AvrBsT-triggered ETI during //Pst//  DC3000 infection. Microscopy studies revealed that ACIP1 is associated with punctae on the cell cortex and some of these punctae co-localize with microtubules. Wild-type //Pst//  DC3000 or //Pst//  DC3000 AvrRpt2 infection triggered the formation of numerous, small ACIP1 punctae and rods. By contrast, //Pst//  DC3000 AvrBsT infection primarily triggered the formation of large GFP-ACIP1 aggregates, in an acetyltransferase-dependent manner. These data suggested that AvrBsT-dependent acetylation //in planta//  alters ACIP1’s defense function, which is linked to the activation of ETI (Cheong //et al//., 2014).
  
 === Interaction partners === === Interaction partners ===
  
   * Yeast two-hybrid based analyses identified a putative regulator of sugar metabolism, SNF1-related kinase 1 (SnRK1), as an interactor of AvrBsT (Szczesny //et al//., 2010). Gene silencing experiments revealed that SnRK1 is required for the induction of the AvrBs1-specific HR, which is suppressed by AvrBsT (Szczesny //et al//., 2010). Thus, SnRK1 may be involved in the AvrBsT-mediated suppression of the AvrBs1-specific HR (Szczesny //et al//., 2010).   * Yeast two-hybrid based analyses identified a putative regulator of sugar metabolism, SNF1-related kinase 1 (SnRK1), as an interactor of AvrBsT (Szczesny //et al//., 2010). Gene silencing experiments revealed that SnRK1 is required for the induction of the AvrBs1-specific HR, which is suppressed by AvrBsT (Szczesny //et al//., 2010). Thus, SnRK1 may be involved in the AvrBsT-mediated suppression of the AvrBs1-specific HR (Szczesny //et al//., 2010).
-  * Later, the pepper SGT1 (for suppressor of the G2 allele of //skp1//) and PIK1 (for receptor-like cytoplasmic kinase1) were identified as a host interactor of AvrBsT. SGT1 forms a heterotrimeric complex with both AvrBsT and PIK1 exclusively in the cytoplasm. PIK1 specifically phosphorylates SGT1 and AvrBsT in vitro. AvrBsT binding to SGT1 resulted in the inhibition of PIK1-mediated SGT1 phosphorylation and subsequent nuclear transport of the SGT1-PIK1 complex (Kim //et al//., 2014).+  * Later, the pepper SGT1 (for suppressor of the G2 allele of //skp1//) and PIK1 (for receptor-like cytoplasmic kinase1) were identified as host interactors of AvrBsT. SGT1 forms a heterotrimeric complex with both AvrBsT and PIK1 exclusively in the cytoplasm. PIK1 specifically phosphorylates SGT1 and AvrBsT in vitro. AvrBsT binding to SGT1 resulted in the inhibition of PIK1-mediated SGT1 phosphorylation and subsequent nuclear transport of the SGT1-PIK1 complex (Kim //et al//., 2014).
   * Using a yeast two-hybrid screen, the pepper CaHSP70a was identified as another AvrBsT-interacting protein. Bimolecular fluorescence complementation and co-immunoprecipitation assays confirmed the specific interaction between CaHSP70a and AvrBsT //in planta//  (Kim //et al//., 2015a).   * Using a yeast two-hybrid screen, the pepper CaHSP70a was identified as another AvrBsT-interacting protein. Bimolecular fluorescence complementation and co-immunoprecipitation assays confirmed the specific interaction between CaHSP70a and AvrBsT //in planta//  (Kim //et al//., 2015a).
   * Using a yeast two-hybrid screen, the pepper aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 (CaALDH1) was identified as another AvrBsT-interacting protein. Bimolecular fluorescence complementation and co-immunoprecipitation assays confirmed the interaction between CaALDH1 and AvrBsT //in planta//  (Kim //et al//., 2015b).   * Using a yeast two-hybrid screen, the pepper aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 (CaALDH1) was identified as another AvrBsT-interacting protein. Bimolecular fluorescence complementation and co-immunoprecipitation assays confirmed the interaction between CaALDH1 and AvrBsT //in planta//  (Kim //et al//., 2015b).
Line 61: Line 61:
 Yes (//Acidovorax//  spp., //Brenneria//  spp., //Erwinia//  spp., //Pseudomonas//  spp., //Ralstonia//  spp.). Yes (//Acidovorax//  spp., //Brenneria//  spp., //Erwinia//  spp., //Pseudomonas//  spp., //Ralstonia//  spp.).
  
-===== Conservation ===== +=====   =====
- +
-=== In xanthomonads === +
- +
-Yes (//X. euvesicatoria//, //X. arboricola//, //X. citri//, //X. phaseoli//, //X. vasicola//, //X. vesicatoria//). +
- +
-=== In other plant pathogens/symbionts === +
- +
-Yes (//Acidovorax//  spp., //Brenneria//  spp., //Erwinia//  spp., //Pseudomonas//  spp., //Ralstonia//  spp.).+
  
 ===== References ===== ===== References =====
Line 91: Line 83:
 Kim NH, Hwang BK (2015b). Pepper aldehyde dehydrogenase CaALDH1 interacts with //Xanthomonas//  effector AvrBsT and promotes effector-triggered cell death and defence responses. J. Exp. Bot. 66: 3367-3380. DOI: [[https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erv147|10.1093/jxb/erv147]] Kim NH, Hwang BK (2015b). Pepper aldehyde dehydrogenase CaALDH1 interacts with //Xanthomonas//  effector AvrBsT and promotes effector-triggered cell death and defence responses. J. Exp. Bot. 66: 3367-3380. DOI: [[https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erv147|10.1093/jxb/erv147]]
  
-Kim NH, Kim DS, Chung EH, Hwang BK (2014). Pepper suppressor of the G2 allele of //skp1//  interacts with the receptor-like cytoplasmic kinase1 and type III effector AvrBsT and promotes the hypersensitive cell death response in a phosphorylation-dependent manner. Plant Physiol. 165: 76-91. DOI: [[https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.114.238840|10.1104/pp.114.238840]] FIXME  → Infromation not yet incorporated in the profile!+Kim NH, Kim DS, Chung EH, Hwang BK (2014). Pepper suppressor of the G2 allele of //skp1//  interacts with the receptor-like cytoplasmic kinase1 and type III effector AvrBsT and promotes the hypersensitive cell death response in a phosphorylation-dependent manner. Plant Physiol. 165: 76-91. DOI: [[https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.114.238840|10.1104/pp.114.238840]]
  
 Kim NH, Kim BS, Hwang BK (2013). Pepper arginine decarboxylase is required for polyamine and γ-aminobutyric acid signaling in cell death and defense response. Plant Physiol. 162: 2067-2083. DOI: [[https://10.1104/pp.113.217372|10.1104/pp.113.217372]] Kim NH, Kim BS, Hwang BK (2013). Pepper arginine decarboxylase is required for polyamine and γ-aminobutyric acid signaling in cell death and defense response. Plant Physiol. 162: 2067-2083. DOI: [[https://10.1104/pp.113.217372|10.1104/pp.113.217372]]
Line 109: Line 101:
 ===== Further reading ===== ===== Further reading =====
  
-Han SW, Hwang BK (2017). Molecular functions of //Xanthomonas// type III effector AvrBsT and its plant interactors in cell death and defense signaling. Planta 245: 237-253. DOI: [[https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-016-2628-x|10.1007/s00425-016-2628-x]]+Han SW, Hwang BK (2017). Molecular functions of //Xanthomonas//  type III effector AvrBsT and its plant interactors in cell death and defense signaling. Planta 245: 237-253. DOI: [[https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-016-2628-x|10.1007/s00425-016-2628-x]]
  
 Timilsina S, Abrahamian P, Potnis N, Minsavage GV, White FF, Staskawicz BJ, Jones JB, Vallad GE, Goss EM (2016). Analysis of sequenced genomes of Xanthomonas perforans identifies candidate targets for resistance breeding in tomato. Phytopathology 106: 1097-1104. DOI: [[https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-03-16-0119-FI|10.1094/PHYTO-03-16-0119-FI]] Timilsina S, Abrahamian P, Potnis N, Minsavage GV, White FF, Staskawicz BJ, Jones JB, Vallad GE, Goss EM (2016). Analysis of sequenced genomes of Xanthomonas perforans identifies candidate targets for resistance breeding in tomato. Phytopathology 106: 1097-1104. DOI: [[https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-03-16-0119-FI|10.1094/PHYTO-03-16-0119-FI]]
  
bacteria/t3e/xopj2.1594308665.txt.gz · Last modified: 2020/07/09 17:31 by rkoebnik

Page Tools

Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International
CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki